AI Image Model Comparison

The best AI image model for every job

The strongest model depends entirely on the job. Pick what you are making below to see the exact same professional prompt rendered by the top models side by side — and copy the prompt to use yourself.

8 jobs comparedSame prompt per jobCopyable pro prompts

The lineup

Strengths & trade-offs, model by model

Every image model on DesignerBox, what it is great at, and where it falls short — so you spend credits on the right one.

Nano Banana Pro

Google

The versatile all-rounder

Best for: Hero shots, editing, and consistent characters

  • Best all-round quality and prompt adherence
  • Seven editing modes — background swap, product, inpaint, outpaint
  • Multi-reference for character and style consistency
  • Highest credit cost of the Gemini pair
  • Overkill for simple, high-volume drafts
from 14 cr/imageView model →

GPT Image 2

OpenAI

The text-in-image champion

Best for: Ads, posters, and anything with readable on-image text

  • Best-in-class text rendering inside images
  • Handles long, complex prompts reliably
  • Up to 4K with strong photorealism
  • Most expensive per image
  • Slower than the lighter models
from 22 cr/imageView model →

FLUX 2 Flex

Black Forest Labs

Typography and fine control

Best for: Typography-heavy and finely tuned compositions

  • Superior typography and retexturing
  • Multi-reference editing
  • Guidance, seed, and step control for fine-tuning
  • One image per run
  • Rewards careful prompt tuning
from 7 cr/imageView model →

Seedream 5

ByteDance

The budget workhorse

Best for: Budget batches that still need legible text

  • Lowest credit cost of the lineup
  • Native text rendering at 2K–3K
  • Up to six images per run, ten references
  • Newer and less battle-tested than the majors
from 4 cr/imageView model →

Nano Banana 2

Google

Fast and production-scale

Best for: High-volume content where speed and cost matter

  • Fast, production-scale generation
  • Half the cost of Nano Banana Pro
  • Same editing and multi-reference toolkit
  • Slightly lower fidelity ceiling than Pro
from 7 cr/imageView model →

FLUX Pro 1.1

Black Forest Labs

Cheap, fast photorealism

Best for: High-volume photoreal drafts on a budget

  • Very fast and very low cost
  • Clean professional photorealism
  • Seed and prompt-enhance control
  • Text-to-image only — no editing or references
  • Weaker on stylised or artistic looks
from 5 cr/imageView model →

Kontext Multi

Black Forest Labs

Consistency across a series

Best for: Consistent characters and style across a campaign

  • Combines multiple references for consistent characters
  • Locks style across an entire series
  • Image-to-image only — needs input images
  • Not for from-scratch text-to-image
Editing modelView model →

Try every model on one canvas

Generate with all of these models from a single DesignerBox account — switch between them in a click and only pay for what you run.

Start creating free

Each comparison is generated from a single identical prompt per job, with no cherry-picking or retouching. Results vary run to run; your own prompts and settings will shape the final output. Product and brand names in prompts are used illustratively to compare model behaviour.

×